A Texas physician disclosed on Saturday that he had carried out an abortion in defiance of a brand new state legislation that bans most abortions after six weeks of being pregnant, establishing a possible check case of one of the vital restrictive abortion measures within the nation.

In an opinion essay revealed in The Washington Submit underneath the headline “Why I violated Texas’s excessive abortion ban,” the physician, Alan Braid, who has been performing abortions for greater than 40 years, stated that he carried out one on Sept. 6 for a lady who, though nonetheless in her first trimester, was past the state’s new restrict.

“I acted as a result of I had an obligation of care to this affected person, as I do for all sufferers, and since she has a elementary proper to obtain this care,” Dr. Braid wrote. “I totally understood that there might be authorized penalties — however I wished to ensure that Texas didn’t get away with its bid to stop this blatantly unconstitutional legislation from being examined.”

Dr. Braid’s disclosure was the most recent — and maybe most direct — salvo by supporters of abortion rights who’ve been preventing to cease the legislation, which prohibits most abortions after about six weeks of being pregnant, earlier than many ladies are even conscious that they’re pregnant. The legislation makes no exception for pregnancies ensuing from rape or incest.

Even earlier than his disclosure, Dr. Braid, who has operated abortion clinics in Houston and San Antonio in addition to in Oklahoma, was already difficult the legislation in court docket. His clinics are among the many plaintiffs in a pending federal lawsuit searching for to overturn the measure.

On Sept. 1, the Supreme Courtroom, in a 5-4 resolution prompted by the lawsuit, declined to instantly block Texas’ new legislation. The bulk harassed that it was not ruling on the legislation’s constitutionality and didn’t intend to restrict “procedurally correct challenges” to it.

On Tuesday, the Justice Division requested a federal choose to problem an order that might stop Texas from imposing the legislation, referred to as Senate Invoice 8, which was handed with the robust help of the state’s Republican leaders.

The Justice Division argued in its emergency movement that the state adopted the legislation “to stop girls from exercising their constitutional rights,” reiterating an argument the division made final week when it sued Texas to ban enforcement of the contentious laws.

On the middle of the authorized debate over the legislation is a mechanism that primarily deputizes personal residents, somewhat than authorities officers, to implement the brand new restrictions by suing anybody who both performs an abortion or “aids and abets” the process. Plaintiffs who don’t have any connection to the affected person or to the clinic might sue and recuperate authorized charges, in addition to $10,000 in the event that they win. Sufferers themselves can’t be sued.

“I perceive that by offering an abortion past the brand new authorized restrict, I’m taking a private danger, nevertheless it’s one thing I consider in strongly,” Dr. Braid wrote.

Nancy Northup, president and chief government of the Heart for Reproductive Rights, which is already representing Dr. Braid in his clinics’ pending lawsuit, stated in a press release that he had “courageously stood up towards this blatantly unconstitutional legislation.”

“We stand able to defend him towards the vigilante lawsuits that S.B. 8 threatens to unleash towards these offering or supporting entry to constitutionally protected abortion care,” she stated in a press release.

Texas Proper to Life, an anti-abortion group that had been searching for recommendations on any docs who may be violating the brand new legislation, stated in a press release that it was “wanting into this declare however we’re doubtful that that is only a authorized stunt.”

“The abortion trade has struck out on their 16 earlier makes an attempt to cease this legislation from saving lives up to now and this can be one other try,” the group stated. “Nonetheless, there’s a four-year statute of limitations for any violations and the Professional-Life motion is devoted to making sure that the Texas Heartbeat Act is totally enforced.”

In an interview on Saturday, Dr. Braid declined to say whether or not the girl whose abortion he carried out on Sept. 6 had been knowledgeable that her process might be a part of a check case towards the brand new legislation. “I’m not going to reply any questions concerning the affected person in any approach,” he stated.

He stated that he had consulted with attorneys from the Heart for Reproductive Rights and hoped that, by publicly stating that he had carried out an abortion, he may contribute to the marketing campaign to invalidate the legislation.

“I hope the legislation will get overturned,” he stated, “and if that is what does it, that might be nice.”

In his opinion essay, Dr. Braid famous that his profession started with an obstetrics and gynecology residency at a San Antonio hospital on July 1, 1972, simply earlier than Roe v. Wade, the 1973 resolution that established a constitutional proper to abortion.

“On the hospital that 12 months, I noticed three youngsters die from unlawful abortions,” he wrote. “One I’ll always remember. When she got here into the E.R., her vaginal cavity was full of rags. She died just a few days later from large organ failure, brought on by a septic an infection.”

Roe v. Wade, he wrote, “enabled me to do the job I used to be skilled to do.” Then, this month, “every part modified” with the Supreme Courtroom resolution to not block the Texas legislation.

“I’ve daughters, granddaughters and nieces,” Dr. Braid wrote. “I consider abortion is an important a part of well being care. I’ve spent the previous 50 years treating and serving to sufferers. I can’t simply sit again and watch us return to 1972.”